Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rediscovering Vinyl's avatar

Really enjoyed this piece. I’d heard some of the early Beatles/Stones crossover before, but you filled in a lot of gaps for me. The only thing I’d add is that the “Stones ripping off the Beatles” angle feels a little harsher than the history supports. The bands were genuinely friendly with each other. Any rivalry lived with the fans, not the musicians. The “Beatles or Stones?” question became a personality test for a reason — both bands were doing something distinct. However, the correlations, especially the album cover comparisons, were brilliant.

Frances Leader's avatar

"Maybe the Stones were making fun of the media for reading too much into the Beatles-Stones rivalry." - Good point to end your article! That was exactly how it was at the time. We loved the Beatles and the Stones very much. There was no reason to like one or the other, we could enjoy them both and the good-natured banter between them. It was a magical time and lots of small bands sprung up under the influence of those two iconic bands.

I am especially astonished that the Stones are still together and touring. Who would ever have expected that?

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?